Übersetzung für 'persist' im kostenlosen Englisch-Deutsch Wörterbuch von LANGENSCHEIDT – mit Beispielen, Synonymen und Aussprache. Lernen Sie die Übersetzung für 'persist' in LEOs Englisch ⇔ Deutsch Wörterbuch. Mit Flexionstabellen der verschiedenen Fälle und Zeiten ✓ Aussprache und. If the rash persists for more than a day, see a doctor. persist (with [sb]) vi.
Deutsch-Englisch-WörterbuchEnglisch-Deutsch-Übersetzungen für persists im Online-Wörterbuch databridgesolutions.com (Deutschwörterbuch). Übersetzung Englisch-Deutsch für persist im PONS Online-Wörterbuch nachschlagen! Gratis Vokabeltrainer, Verbtabellen, Aussprachefunktion. Viele übersetzte Beispielsätze mit "persist" – Deutsch-Englisch Wörterbuch und Suchmaschine für Millionen von Deutsch-Übersetzungen.
Persists Deutsch Navigation menu VideoLegend of Solgard Level 100 - Gloom King Persists Define persists. persists synonyms, persists pronunciation, persists translation, English dictionary definition of persists. intr.v. per·sist·ed, per·sist·ing, per·sists 1. To be obstinately repetitious, insistent, or tenacious. 2. To hold firmly and steadfastly to a purpose. American restaurants that revolutionized the way we eat Deutsche Bank's return to financial health persists into Q3 FRANKFURT, Germany (AP) — Deutsche Bank reported its third straight quarterly. Lernen Sie die Übersetzung für 'persists' in LEOs Englisch ⇔ Deutsch Wörterbuch. Mit Flexionstabellen der verschiedenen Fälle und Zeiten Aussprache und relevante Diskussionen Kostenloser Vokabeltrainer. Deutsche Bank's return to financial health persists into Q3 The moon shines next to the headquarters of the Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt, Germany, early Sunday, Oct. 4, (AP Photo/Michael Probst). Deutsche Bank’s return to financial health persists into Q3 By DAVID McHUGH October 28, The moon shines next to the headquarters of the Deutsche Bank in Frankfurt, Germany, early Sunday, Oct. 4,
Word Lists. Choose your language. My word lists. Tell us about this example sentence:. The word in the example sentence does not match the entry word.
The sentence contains offensive content. Cancel Submit. Your feedback will be reviewed. C2 If an unpleasant feeling or situation persists, it continues to exist :.
If the pain persists, consult a doctor. The cold weather is set to persist throughout the week. C2 to try to do or continue doing something in a determined but often unreasonable way:.
If he persists in asking awkward questions , then send him to the boss. The government is persisting with its ambitious public works programme.
If symptoms persist seek medical attention. Despite this accumulation of evidence , the government persisted in doing nothing. Must you persist in blaming yourself for what happened?
Want to learn more? Although the meeting had ended , she persisted in trying to question the mayor. Examples of persist.
An alternating pattern may result, for example, from a cyclic component with a period of about 2 days; persisting patterns may arise in several ways.
From the Cambridge English Corpus. Despite the clearance of parasitaemia, pathological changes persisted in the chronic phase.
These examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the Cambridge Dictionary editors or of Cambridge University Press or its licensors.
Outside the sport hunting heartlands, a utilitarian, and increasingly commercial, attitude towards wild animals persisted among both the rural gentry and the state.
Although many rules of coverture persisted into the twentieth century, the traditional principles of coverture were eroding.
In many borderland villages, social boundaries between locals and exchangees persisted, together with negative views about the other group.
The principal danger is that their current levels of distrust and disengagement will prove to be a generational effect that persists over the long term.
Although a large epidemic has not occurred since , traces of epidemic periodicity have still persisted from to at 3-year intervals.
I n fact such vortices may be regarded as a rearranging mechanism installed in the flow and persisting for a considerable distance downstream.
Within this context, legal proceedings in military courts and arrests of labor leaders, workers, and other pro-democracy activists persisted unabated.
The results persisted after adjustments for confounders data not shown. When uncertainty persists, it is always better to enter within the constraints of the cost of entry.
I would contend that the continuities persisted much further into the s than this. This helps make sure a study is as accurate and as truthful as possible.
I think the real mistake is treating any single study as definitive. As Dr. The glaring issue here is that pretty much nothing is normal during this pandemic—including how experts research and use different kinds of medical treatment.
At the start of the pandemic, when hospitals were overwhelmed, doctors were willing to try just about anything in an attempt to save critically ill patients.
Under normal circumstances, meeting these criteria would have led doctors to study a drug for a specific purpose—not automatically use it.
Doctors can really do whatever they want. This added to the confusion in public understanding of hydroxychloroquine.
Given how quickly the coronavirus situation is changing, pre-print research published on sources like bioRxiv and medRxiv has been integral to helping the world quickly discover important information about this disease.
The goal is for pre-print papers to eventually get peer reviewed and published in a journal, but when it seems like they have answers to COVID mysteries, there can be real value in sharing them before the peer-review and publication process is done.
Sometimes it may be because a paper winds up having a massive flaw in design or execution. Another major factor that made the hydroxychloroquine vetting process abnormal: Some politicians and high-profile figures gave the drug far too large of a platform.
Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro has claimed hydroxychloroquine would treat him when he tested positive for the virus.
In May, American President Donald Trump said he was taking the medication preventively in case he contracted the infection. Some followers of these public figures, along with various adamant scientists, continue to publicly support the drug as a potential treatment even though scores of public health experts and agencies insist hydroxychloroquine has no significant value against the coronavirus.
First, let's discuss why some proponents of hydroxychloroquine think it can help treat COVID in the first place.
Some doctors and researchers were especially interested in trying to treat COVID by using hydroxychloroquine combined with zinc or azithromycin. Some evidence suggested chloroquine of which hydroxychloroquine is a derivative could help zinc do this job.
Most people in the U. But some groups of people who are more likely to develop severe cases of COVID—such as older adults —are also more likely to get less than the recommended daily amount of zinc, according to the National Institutes of Health NIH.
As a result, some researchers have speculated that people with COVID who are at high risk for severe cases may avoid serious complications if they receive hydroxychloroquine combined with a zinc supplement early on in their treatment.
As for hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin : Azithromycin is an antibiotic that treats bacterial infections like pneumonia, which people with viral respiratory infections including COVID often develop.
Because past research suggests that azithromycin is effective in treating people with Zika and Ebola viruses, and that the drug may help prevent severe respiratory tract infections in people with viral infections, some researchers hypothesize that if hydroxychloroquine were effective against COVID, adding azithromycin to the mix could help better treat severe coronavirus cases.
Unfortunately, the major studies in this camp have limitations that cast doubt on their findings that hydroxychloroquine may treat COVID Risch is the author of a review and a letter to the editor , both published in the American Journal of Epidemiology , arguing that doctors should treat high-risk COVID patients with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as soon as possible after infection.
As evidence of his point, Dr. Risch cites results from research like a controlled non-randomized study in Brazil. The people who declined the treatment made up the control group.
The study found that those who got the treatment were less likely to be hospitalized for their symptoms 1. But, crucially, in addition to not being peer reviewed, randomized, or blinded, the study does not specify if any of the participants had actually tested positive for COVID The study was a retrospective case series, meaning it used preexisting data for the analysis rather than recruiting participants specifically for the study.
Of the people involved, began taking hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin and zinc for five days about four days after their symptoms started.
Another untreated people made up the control group. Ultimately, the researchers found that people in the treatment group were less likely to be hospitalized 2.
There were multiple limitations with this study, though, like the researchers excluding some patients then adding others without explaining why.
The researchers did adjust for the fact that there were nearly three times as many people in the non-treatment group.
Even a July International Journal of Infectious Diseases retrospective study, which many hydroxychloroquine proponents cite in support of the drug, has its issues.
Some received hydroxychloroquine, some received azithromycin, some received both, and some took neither medication. One major limitation to these findings: People who took hydroxychloroquine or hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin were about twice as likely to also receive steroids than people who received neither drug.
That makes it tough to determine which drug was responsible for the noted benefit. That's important because a growing amount of high-quality clinical trials has suggested that steroids may reduce the risk of death from COVID, leading the World Health Organization to update its guidance in early September to encourage steroids as a treatment for severely ill patients.